MPG Home MPG Programs by Topic MPG Programs


The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s (OJJDP’s) Model Programs Guide (MPG) contains information about evidence-based juvenile justice and youth prevention, intervention, and reentry programs. It is a resource for practitioners and communities about what works, what is promising, and what does not work in juvenile justice, delinquency prevention, and child protection and safety.

MPG uses expert study reviewers and’s program review process, scoring instrument, and evidence standards. The two sites also share a common database of juvenile-related programs. When a user selects a program on MPG, the user will see the profile open in a new window.

MPG is an easy-to-use program database established to assist practitioners, policymakers, and communities in identifying and implementing programs that can make a difference in the lives of children and families. It addresses a range of issues including child victimization, substance abuse, youth violence, mental health and trauma, and gang activity.

In addition to providing program profiles, MPG contains useful literature reviews, implementation information, and links to additional resources that practitioners, policymakers, and communities can use to improve the effectiveness of interventions, enhance accountability, ensure public safety, and reduce recidivism.  The tools provided on MPG are specifically designed for juvenile justice-oriented practitioners and policymakers.

MPG is a widely recognized resource for valuable information on the effectiveness of many juvenile programs; however, the programs contained in MPG may not be appropriate for or meet the needs of all individuals and communities or for all circumstances.  When selecting what will work best for you or your community, you should remain aware that the information in MPG is just one resource to consider among many.  Read more: How To Use the Model Programs Guide.

The Model Programs Guide is not an exhaustive list of all juvenile justice -related programs, and a program’s inclusion on this site does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice. Read more.

Model Programs Guide Program Review Process and Evidence Ratings

Model Programs Guide (MPG) uses expert study reviewers and's program review process, scoring instrument, and evidence ratings. The two sites also share a common program database.

For details on the on the MPG expert study reviewers: Model Programs Guide Reviewers

For details of the full program review process and evidence standards, visit

For the Program Evidence Scoring Instrument, visit

Based on the Study Reviewers’ assessment of the evidence, programs included on MPG and are rated as either Effective, Promising, or No Effects.

Evidence Ratings
Evidence Rating Icon* Description
One Study More than One Study
Effective effective icon effective multi-study icon Programs have strong evidence indicating they achieve their intended outcomes when implemented with fidelity.
Promising promising icon promising multi-study icon Programs have some evidence indicating they achieve their intended outcomes. Additional research is recommended.
No Effects no effects icon no effects multi-study icon Programs have strong evidence indicating that they did not achieve their intended outcomes when implemented with fidelity.

* A single study icon is used to identify programs that have been evaluated with only one study. A multiple studies icon is used to represent a greater extent of evidence supporting the evidence rating. The icon depicts programs that have more than one study in the evidence base demonstrating effects in a consistent direction.

Read more about:

Nominate a Program to Model Programs Guide

Model Programs Guide welcomes program nominations. For a program’s evaluation evidence to be reviewed for inclusion in MPG, it must target juveniles and meet the program scope and evaluation studies screening criteria.

A nominated program must target an at-risk or offender population and aim to—


There must also be existing evaluation research studies that meet the following criteria:

When submitting a program for consideration, include as much information about the program and the research evaluations, including citations, as possible. Review’s “Program Review and Rating From Start to Finish” page to help guide the submission:

However, programs may be nominated without specific citations. In such cases, the inclusion of referrals to individuals who may have more information or be in possession of such studies is helpful. Qualitative studies are also welcome as they may provide valuable context for a program.

To learn more and to nominate a program, see the Nominate section of and complete the nomination form.

Model Programs Guide Reviewers

All MPG study reviewers have extensive expertise in juvenile justice issues as well as research methodology and have completed the reviewer training process. Study reviewers are responsible for reviewing and rating the individual studies that comprise a program’s evidence base.

Following is a list of MPG lead researchers and reviewers.

For more information about the reviewer qualifications and training, visit

History of the Model Programs Guide

In 2000, OJJDP published a print version of the Model Programs Guide (MPG) as one of the first comprehensive resources to identify evidence-based programs in delinquency prevention. OJJDP developed MPG to support the Title V Prevention Grants program. OJJDP later transitioned MPG to an online database with programs across the continuum of youth prevention, intervention, and reentry services. MPG continues to be a widely recognized and used resource on evidence-based programs for practitioners and communities. In June 2011, the Office of Justice Programs launched, which builds on and expands this previous work using a more rigorous review process and enhanced online interface to present evidence for programs within juvenile justice, adult criminal justice, and crime victim services.

At that time, OJJDP began re-reviewing all programs in MPG using the evidence standards and criteria and in 2013, relaunched MPG with juvenile justice and youth prevention, intervention, and treatment programs that have been reviewed using’s evidence standards and criteria.  The two sites now share a common database of juvenile-related programs. The new MPG provides users with an updated, user-friendly website that features information about evidence-based programs and a variety of implementation tools and resources tailored to the needs of the juvenile justice field.

Model Program Guide Evidence Rating Inquiries and Appeals

Model Programs Guide and are committed to principles of quality, fairness, and transparency in its program reviews. As part of that commitment, any party, such as the program developer or researcher, may submit an inquiry regarding an evidence rating or the inclusion of a program in the Programs With Insufficient Evidence section of

The inquiry should be grounded in (1) a fair reading of the evidence (see the program’s Evidence Base in the program profile) and (2) an understanding of the rating procedures and criteria established for ( see Program Review and Rating From Start to Finish). Inquiries should be submitted using the Contact Us form found on

A written response will be made to each formal inquiry. The goal of the response is to provide additional explanation for the evidence rating that was assigned. The response may include paraphrased or excerpted comments from the reviewers’ scoring instruments to explain why certain sections of the instrument (e.g., Design Quality or Outcome Evidence) received the scores given. Under no circumstances will the identity of the reviewers be provided. If applicable, additional information, such as information regarding the resolution of disparate scores among reviewers, may also be included in the response.

For more information on the inquiries and appeals process, visit

How To Use the Model Programs Guide

The Model Programs Guide is intended to be a central, reliable, and credible resource to help practitioners and policymakers understand what works in juvenile justice-related programs and practices. Its purpose is to assist in practical decision making and program implementation by gathering information on specific juvenile justice-related programs and reviewing the existing evaluation research against standard criteria.

It is important to note the Model Programs Guide website does not constitute an endorsement of particular programs, nor does it conduct original research. The programs reported upon favorably are being recognized for their accomplishments in support of the mission of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP). Furthermore, it is not intended to replace or supersede informed judgment and/or innovation. Model Programs Guide recognizes that rigorous evaluation evidence is one of several factors to consider in justice programming, policy, and funding decisions. The Office of Justice Programs also recognizes the importance of encouraging and supporting innovative approaches that may not yet have extensive evidence of effectiveness.

Important Notes About How To Use the Information Provided on Model Programs Guide

Contact Model Programs Guide

For more information related to the Model Programs Guide, contact:

Rachel Stephenson, M.A.
Project Director, OJJDP’s Model Programs Guide (MPG)
Development Services Group, Inc.
7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800E
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: 301-951-0056
Fax: 301-951-3324