Your browser does not support JavaScript!
PREVENTION
Academic Skills Enhancement
Afterschool/Recreation
Alternative School
Bullying
Classroom Curricula
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Community and Problem-Oriented Policing
Community Awareness/Mobilization
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gang Prevention
Gender-Specific Programming
Leadership and Youth Development
Mentoring
Parent Training
School/Classroom Environment
Truancy Prevention
Vocational/Job Training
Wraparound/Case Management
IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS
Afterschool/Recreation
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Conflict Resolution/Interpersonal Skills
Diversion
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gender-Specific Programming
Parent Training
Teen/Youth Court
Restorative Justice
Wraparound/Case Management
INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS
Afterschool/Recreation
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Drug Court
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gun Court
Gender-Specific Programming
Home Confinement
Mental Health Court
Probation Services
Restorative Justice
Shelter Care
Wraparound/Case Management
RESIDENTIAL
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Correctional Facilities
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Group Home
Residential Treatment Centers
Wilderness Camps
REENTRY
Aftercare
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Reentry Court
Vocational/Job Training
MPG HOME
SEARCH HOME
SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE
SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS
PROGRAM TYPES
RATING SYSTEM
REFERENCES
NOMINATE PROGRAMS
RELATED LINKS
RESOURCES
DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE
DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE
Kentucky Adolescent Tobacco Prevention Project
Intervention:
The Kentucky Adolescent Tobacco Prevention Project is a school-based curriculum for high-risk middle school students who live in tobacco-producing areas. The six-session program uses trained peer leaders to assist with skills training. Students learn
How to recognize types of peer pressure
Refusal skills
Assertiveness skills
How to recognize and counter advertising appeals
In the program, students pledge not to use tobacco, and they learn about the negative consequences of using tobacco, including immediate physical consequences. The program includes three booster sessions to reinforce earlier-taught concepts. The basic curriculum is delivered in seventh grade. Three booster sessions are delivered in eighth grade.
Evaluation Methodology:
The evaluation investigated the efficacy of a social-influences tobacco-prevention program in delaying adoption of tobacco use among adolescents residing in a high-tobacco-production area. The study involved a randomized community design with random allocation of entire schools to study conditions, along with a nested experimental design in which students within schools were followed over time to assess the effect of the intervention. The sample included 19 schools in 14 counties, which annually produce an average of 7.7 million pounds of tobacco. A total of 3,588 seventh grade students with a mean age of 12.4 years were included in the baseline analysis. Of these students, 50.8 percent were girls, 92.0 percent were white, 5.6 percent were African-American. Data analysis included the 3,072 students present for all three surveys.
Students in 10 schools received the educational intervention in the springs of seventh and eighth grade. Students in nine schools received health education as usual. Measurements of tobacco use (both smokeless and cigarettes) and other variables were collected in the autumns of seventh, eighth, and ninth grades. Data collection was conducted through class-administered surveys and privately administered tests for carbon monoxide in expired air.
Evaluation Outcome:
The study found that minimal intervention with a high-risk group achieved modest effects. Specifically, when compared with the control group, smoking rates in the treatment group were lower for 30-day, 7-day, and 24-hour smoking. The intervention particularly affected those involved in raising tobacco. For instance, the differences between the treatment and control group for those involved in raising tobacco were 29 percent (30 days), 25 percent (7 days), and 30 percent (24 hours), while the differences between the treatment and control group for those not involved in tobacco raising were lower at 23 percent (30 days), 21 percent (7 days), and 23 percent (24 hours). However, the intervention did not appear to affect the use of smokeless tobacco by male students.
Other Information:
References:
Noland, Melody Powers. 1996. “Tobacco Prevention in Tobacco-Raising Areas: Lessons From the Lions Den.”
Journal of School Health
66(7):266–68.
Noland, Melody Powers, Richard J. Kryscio, John Hinkle, Richard S. Riggs, Linda H. Linville, Viki Y. Ford, and Thomas C. Tucker. 1996. “Relationship of Personal Tobacco-Raising, Parental Smoking, and Other Factors to Tobacco Use Among Adolescents Living in a Tobacco-Producing Region.”
Addictive Behaviors
21(3):349–61.
Noland, Melody Powers, Richard J. Kryscio, Richard S. Riggs, Linda H. Linville, Viki Y. Ford, and Thomas C. Tucker. 1998. “The Effectiveness of a Tobacco Prevention Program With Adolescents Living in a Tobacco-Producing Region.”
American Journal of Public Health
88(12):1862–65.
Program Specification:
Current Rating:
Promising
Expected Date of Re-Review:
Spring 2013
Program Type:
Alcohol and Drug Therapy / Education
Classroom Curricula
Ethnicity:
African American
White
Gender:
Both
Age:
11
-
14
Target Settings:
Rural
Problem Behaviors:
Alcohol,Tobacco and Other Drug Use
Risk & Protective Factors:
Risk
Family
Family history of problem behavior / Parent criminality
Family management problems / Poor parental supervision and/or monitoring
Individual
Favorable attitudes toward drug use/Early onset of AOD use/Alcohol and/or drug use
Peer
Peer alcohol, tobacco, and/or other drug use
Protective
Family
Effective parenting
Individual
Positive / Resilient temperament
Peer
Involvement with positive peer group activities
Additional Information:
SAMHSA: NREPP
Status:
Program is in operation at this time.
Performance Measures:
Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):
Delinquency Prevention
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model:
PDF
Performance Matrix:
PDF
School Programs
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model:
PDF
Performance Matrix:
PDF
Contact Information:
Program Developer:
Melody Powers Noland, Ph.D., CHES
202 Seaton Building
Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion
Lexington,
KY
40506–0219
Phone: 8592575826
Fax: 8593231090
Email:
Click Here