Minneapolis Center for Victim–Offender Mediation (OJJDP Model Program Guide)

Office of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships – Safer Neighborhoods

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Serving Children, Families and Communities

PREVENTION

IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS

INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS

RESIDENTIAL

REENTRY

MPG HOME SEARCH HOME SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS PROGRAM TYPES RATING SYSTEM REFERENCES NOMINATE PROGRAMS RELATED LINKS RESOURCES DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE

Minneapolis Center for Victim–Offender Mediation

Intervention:

The Center for Victim–Offender Mediation in Minneapolis, Minnesota, was initiated by the Minnesota Citizens Council on Crime and Justice in 1985. The center operates within a jurisdiction of 2 million people in the Minneapolis–St. Paul metropolitan area. The program is designed to provide victims with the opportunity to meet their offenders in a safe and structured setting for dialog, negotiation, and problem solving. It was the first such program in a large urban jurisdiction. The center averages more than 900 case referrals a year. The citizens’ council mediation service also has a parent–child mediation program, a school mediation program, and a mediation training program in juvenile correctional institutions.

Evaluation Methodology:

Study 1
The Center for Victim–Offender Mediation participated in the first large cross-site evaluation of victim–offender mediation services conducted by Umbreit and Coates (1992). The other programs studied were located in Albuquerque, N.M.; Austin, Texas; and Oakland, Calif. The study used a nonequivalent control group design with pretest and posttest. The comparison group at each site consisted of similar offenders from the same jurisdiction matched by age, sex, race, offense, and restitution amount who did not receive mediation. The data was collected through interviews with 1,153 crime victims and juvenile offenders, reviews of program records and court records, interviews with court officials and program staff, and observation of 28 mediation sessions. Pre- and post-interviews were used to assess the impact of the program. Pre-interviews occurred only with the mediation sample and were conducted over the phone within a week of the mediation. Post-interviews were held 2 months after the completion of the mediation session. Comparison group interviews occurred over the phone about 2 months after the case disposition date. Among the outcome measures used to examine this program were client satisfaction, client perceptions of fairness, restitution rates, completion rates, and recidivism.

Evaluation Outcome:

Study 1
The evaluation findings demonstrate that victim–offender mediation at each site resulted in juvenile offenders committing considerably fewer additional crimes during the 1-year follow-up period than similar offenders in the court-administered restitution program. They also tended to commit crimes that were less serious than the offense of referral. However, this finding is not statistically significant. Thus the possibility that this effect can occur by chance cannot be ruled out.

The evaluation also found high levels of client satisfaction (90 percent of victims and 91 percent of offenders) and perceptions of fairness (83 percent of victims and 89 percent of offenders). Moreover, victims who participated in the mediation process were significantly more likely to view the system as fair than similar victims who did not participate in mediation. The mediation process also had a strong impact on the likelihood of offenders successfully completing their restitution obligation to their victims.

Other Information:

References:

Umbreit, Mark S., and Robert B. Coates. 1992. Victim–Offender Mediation: An Analysis of Programs in Four States of the U.S. Minneapolis, Minn.: Minnesota Citizens Council on Crime and Justice.

———. 1993. “Cross-Site Analysis of Victim–Offender Mediation in Four States.” Crime And Delinquency 39(4):565–85.

Program Specification:

Current Rating:

Promising

Expected Date of Re-Review:

Spring 2013

Program Type:

Diversion

Restorative Justice

Ethnicity:

African American

White

Gender:

Both

Age:

10 - 18

Special Populations:

First-Time Offenders

Less Serious Offender

Target Settings:

Rural

Suburban

Urban

Tribal

Problem Behaviors:

Delinquency

Risk & Protective Factors:

Risk

Protective

Additional Information:

Status:

Program is in operation at this time.

Performance Measures:

Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):

Restitution/Community Service
Restorative Justice
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
Diversion
Restorative Justice
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF

Contact Information:

Program Developer:
Doreene Langasan, Administrator
Victim–Offender Mediation Association, c/o Center
2233 University Avenue West, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55114
Phone: 6128740570
Fax: 6516444227
Email: Click Here
Website: Click Here

Program Locations:
Doreene Langasan, Administrator
Victim–Offender Mediation Association
c/o Center for Policy, Planning, and Performance
St. Paul, MN 55114