Project PATHE (Positive Action Through Holistic Education) (OJJDP Model Program Guide)

Office of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships – Safer Neighborhoods

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Serving Children, Families and Communities

PREVENTION

IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS

INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS

RESIDENTIAL

REENTRY

MPG HOME SEARCH HOME SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS PROGRAM TYPES RATING SYSTEM REFERENCES NOMINATE PROGRAMS RELATED LINKS RESOURCES DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE

Project PATHE (Positive Action Through Holistic Education)

Intervention:

This universal, comprehensive school organizational change program is used in secondary schools to reduce school disorder and improve the school environment, thus enhancing student experiences and attitudes about school. The program seeks to reduce disorder by decreasing academic failure, increasing social bonding, and improving students’ self-concepts. The program targets all students in middle schools and high schools, serving large numbers of minority youths in inner cities and impoverished rural areas.

The five major components are

1) Staff, student, and community participation in planning
2) Schoolwide organizational changes aimed at increasing academic performance
3) Schoolwide organizational changes aimed at enhancing school climate
4) Programs to prepare students for careers
5) Academic and affective services for high-risk youths

The program design is unique in its comprehensive coverage and in its simultaneous concentration on organizations and individual-level change. The school’s climate is enhanced through added extracurricular activities, peer counseling, and school pride campaigns. Job-seeking skills programs and career exploration programs emphasize career attainment. At-risk students receive additional monitoring, tutoring, and counseling.

Evaluation Methodology:

The project design included four experimental middle schools, one control middle school, three experimental high schools, and one control high school. Students were predominantly African-American and resided in both urban and rural areas. The school was the unit of analysis. Students were surveyed in 1981, 1982, and 1983. In 1981 a random sample of 300 students was surveyed in the participating high schools. The entire student and teacher populations were surveyed in the other years (with response rates of 79 percent to 86 percent). In fall 1982 the comparison high school closed. Thus, the evaluation covers a 3-year period for the middle schools in the sample and a 1-year period for the high schools.

Evaluation Outcome:

High school students reported significant decreases in delinquency and drug involvement and fewer school suspensions and less punishment than the control group. Students in the program who received special academic and counseling services reported significantly higher grades and were less likely to repeat a grade than students who did not receive these services. High school seniors who received these services were also more likely to graduate than those who did not receive the services. For middle school students in the intervention, there were declines in suspensions. PATHE high schools, compared with the control groups, showed that self-reported delinquency (including drug involvement, suspensions, and school punishments) declined; school alienation decreased; attachment to school increased; and school climate and discipline management improved in all the treatment schools. At-risk students showed higher rates of graduation and standardized achievement tests and increased school attendance.

Other Information:

References:

Catalano, Richard F., Rolf Loeber, and Kay McKinney. 1999. School and Community Interventions to Prevent Serious and Violent Offending. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Gottfredson, Denise C. 1986. “An Empirical Test of School-Based Environmental and Individual Interventions to Reduce the Risk of Delinquent Behavior.” Criminology 24(4):705–31.

———. 1987. “An Evaluation of an Organization Development Approach to Reducing School Disorder.” Evaluation Review 11:739–63.

———. 1990. Changing School Structures to Benefit High-Risk Youths: Understanding Troubled and Troubling Youth: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

Program Specification:

Current Rating:

Promising

Expected Date of Re-Review:

Summer 2013

Program Type:

Alcohol and Drug Therapy / Education

School/Classroom Environment

Truancy Prevention

Ethnicity:

African American

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

White

Gender:

Both

Age:

11 - 18

Special Populations:

Truant/Dropout

Target Settings:

Urban

Problem Behaviors:

Academic Problems

Risk & Protective Factors:

Risk

Protective

Additional Information:

OJJDP: Blueprints

NIJ: What Works

Status:

Program is NOT in operation at this time.

Performance Measures:

Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):

School Programs
Truancy Prevention
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
School Programs
School/Classroom Environment
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF

Contact Information:

Program Developer:
Denise C. Gottfredson, PhD
Professor University of Maryland
Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 1.301.405.4717
Fax: 1.301.405.4733
Email: Click Here

Program Locations: