Teenage Health Teaching Modules (OJJDP Model Program Guide)

Office of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships – Safer Neighborhoods

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Serving Children, Families and Communities

PREVENTION

IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS

INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS

RESIDENTIAL

REENTRY

MPG HOME SEARCH HOME SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS PROGRAM TYPES RATING SYSTEM REFERENCES NOMINATE PROGRAMS RELATED LINKS RESOURCES DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE

Teenage Health Teaching Modules

Intervention:

Teenage Health Teaching Modules (THTM) is a comprehensive school health curriculum for grades 6 to 12. THTM has three primary components: 1) health tasks of adolescence, 2) health content areas, and 3) essential health skills and themes. Health tasks incorporated in THTM include having friends and building positive relationships, recognizing feelings and managing them in positive ways, and protecting oneself and others from use of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Health content areas include personal health; disease prevention and control; nutrition; alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use; injury and violence prevention; mental and emotional health; consumer health; healthy relationships; community and environmental health; and family life. Examples of health skills addressed in THTM are risk assessment, self-assessment, communication, decision-making, goal setting, health advocacy, and healthy self-management. THTM also reinforces themes of protection, responsibility, interdependence, and respect throughout the curriculum. One of the modules—Aggressors, Victims, and Bystanders—concentrates on middle school violence prevention.

Materials are organized by developmentally based health tasks of concern to adolescents, rather than by content area. THTM is composed of a series of modules, each of which consists of a teacher’s guide with a detailed framework for conducting classroom activities and handouts to be duplicated for student use. Teachers are encouraged to add their own supplementary activities, materials, and ideas. The program does not require a particular implementation sequence, use of a minimum number of modules, or prior training of teachers. All modules are intended to develop five skills: self-assessment, communication, decision-making, health advocacy, and healthy self-management.

Evaluation Methodology:

The evaluation employed a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design to assess THTM’s effectiveness in an experimental setting, in which rigorous control was exercised over exposure to teacher training and choice of curriculum materials (modules) used and a naturalistic setting involving users who had made the independent decision to adopt THTM before the study, with less rigorous control of the teacher training and choice of curriculum materials.

Classes were selected differently for the two types of schools. In experimental schools, one academic subject area was generally selected by school administrators as the appropriate “home” for THTM, and one class section was selected randomly as the treatment group from all class sections at the designated grade level. Likewise, a second academic subject was selected as an appropriate control, and one class section was selected randomly as the control group from available class sections. Control sections were required to contain limited or no health content.

In naturalistic settings, since THTM was already in place, one THTM group was selected randomly from among sections scheduled to receive the selected THTM modules during the observation period. One naturalistic control group was selected randomly from a different academic subject. Again, control sections contained little or no health content.

An attempt was made to select THTM and control classrooms at the same grade level from different academic subjects with mutually exclusive enrollments. In practice, two conditions made such selection difficult: 1) when small schools had only one class section at a grade level, and 2) when larger schools elected to require THTM of all students at the grade level. Under both conditions, the control group was selected randomly at the next higher grade level.

The evaluation study used five data collection instruments. One instrument was administered to students, and teachers completed another instrument. Investigators conducted the evaluation in 149 junior high/middle schools and senior high schools in seven States. The final sample included 4,806 students with matched pretest and posttest questionnaires (2,530 who received THTM and 2,276 controls).

Evaluation Outcome:

THTM produced positive effects on knowledge, attitudes, practices, and some self-reports of behaviors in selected subgroups of students. Junior high/middle school students and senior high school students who were exposed to THTM exhibited more knowledge about health issues in both experimental and naturalistic classrooms. Senior high school students in both experimental and naturalistic settings and junior high/middle school students in naturalistic schools showed desired attitudinal changes.

Exposure to THTM also resulted in several important self-reported behavioral changes. For example, students in senior high experimental and naturalistic schools reported a reduction in drug use and cigarette smoking. Self-reported levels of alcohol consumption also were reduced among senior high school students in naturalistic schools. THTM had no discernible effects on the self-reported behaviors of junior high/middle school students.

The evaluation also found that teachers who received THTM training before they used the curriculum felt more prepared to teach THTM, were less apt to modify the curriculum, and achieved more positive effects on student knowledge (and, at the senior high school level, on attitudes) than teachers who did not receive such training. Fidelity (tendency to implement the curriculum without modification) and proficiency (adaptation of the curriculum to meet student needs) were related independently to various teacher characteristics and to selected students outcomes.

Other Information:

References:

Errecart, Michael T., Herbert J. Walberg, James G. Ross, Robert S. Gold, John L. Fiedler, and Lloyd J. Kolbe. 1991. “Effectiveness of Teenage Health Teaching Modules.” Journal of School Health 61(1):26–30.

Gold, Robert S., Guy S. Parcel, Herbert J. Walberg, Russell V. Luepker, Barry Portnoy, and Elaine J. Stone. 1991. “Summary and Conclusions of the THTM Evaluation: The Expert Work Group Perspective.” Journal of School Health 61(1):39–42.

Nelson, Gary D., S. Cross Floy, and Lloyd J. Kolbe. 1991. “Teenage Health Teaching Modules Evaluation.” Journal of School Health 61(1):19.

Parcel, Guy S., James G. Ross, Alison T. Lavin, Barry Portnoy, Gary D. Nelson, and Franklin Winters. 1991. “Enhancing Implementation of the Teenage Health Teaching Modules.” Journal of School Health 61(1):35–38.

Ross, James G., Russell V. Luepker, Gary D. Nelson, Pedro Saavedra, and Betty M. Hubbard. 1991. “Teenage Health Teaching Modules: Impact of Teacher Training on Implementation and Student Outcomes.” Journal of School Health 61(1):31–34.

Program Specification:

Current Rating:

Promising

Expected Date of Re-Review:

Summer 2013

Program Type:

Alcohol and Drug Therapy / Education

Classroom Curricula

Conflict Resolution / Interpersonal Skills

Leadership and Youth Development

Ethnicity:

American Indian or Alaska Native

Asian

African American

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

White

Gender:

Both

Age:

11 - 18

Target Settings:

Rural

Suburban

Urban

Problem Behaviors:

Alcohol,Tobacco and Other Drug Use

Sexual Activity/Exploitation

Risk & Protective Factors:

Risk

Community

Availability of alcohol and other drugs

Social and physical disorder / Disorganized neighborhood

Family

Family management problems / Poor parental supervision and/or monitoring

Family violence

Pattern of high family conflict

Poor family attachment / Bonding

Individual

Cognitive and neurological deficits/Low intelligence quotient/Hyperactivity

Early sexual involvement

Favorable attitudes toward drug use/Early onset of AOD use/Alcohol and/or drug use

Mental disorder / Mental health problem / Conduct disorder

Poor refusal skills

Victimization and exposure to violence

Peer

Peer alcohol, tobacco, and/or other drug use

Peer rejection

School

Negative attitude toward school / Low bonding / Low school attachment / Commitment to school

Protective

Family

Good relationship with parents / Bonding or attachment to family

Individual

Healthy / Conventional beliefs and clear standards

Positive / Resilient temperament

Self-efficacy

Social competencies and problem solving skills

Peer

Good relationships with peers

School

Opportunities for prosocial school involvement

Student bonding (attachment to teachers, belief, commitment)

Additional Information:

SAMHSA: NREPP

Department of Education

Status:

Program is in operation at this time.

Performance Measures:

Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):

Delinquency Prevention
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
School Programs
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
Delinquency Prevention
Leadership and Youth Development
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF

Contact Information:

Program Developer:
Erica Macheca
Education Development Center, Inc.
55 Chapel Street
Newton, MA 02458
Phone: 8002254276
Fax: 6172243436
Email: Click Here
Website: Click Here