Your browser does not support JavaScript!
PREVENTION
Academic Skills Enhancement
Afterschool/Recreation
Alternative School
Bullying
Classroom Curricula
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Community and Problem-Oriented Policing
Community Awareness/Mobilization
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gang Prevention
Gender-Specific Programming
Leadership and Youth Development
Mentoring
Parent Training
School/Classroom Environment
Truancy Prevention
Vocational/Job Training
Wraparound/Case Management
IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS
Afterschool/Recreation
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Conflict Resolution/Interpersonal Skills
Diversion
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gender-Specific Programming
Parent Training
Teen/Youth Court
Restorative Justice
Wraparound/Case Management
INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS
Afterschool/Recreation
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Drug Court
Drug, Alcohol Therapy/Education
Family Therapy
Gun Court
Gender-Specific Programming
Home Confinement
Mental Health Court
Probation Services
Restorative Justice
Shelter Care
Wraparound/Case Management
RESIDENTIAL
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Correctional Facilities
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Group Home
Residential Treatment Centers
Wilderness Camps
REENTRY
Aftercare
Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
Day/Evening Reporting Center
Reentry Court
Vocational/Job Training
MPG HOME
SEARCH HOME
SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE
SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS
PROGRAM TYPES
RATING SYSTEM
REFERENCES
NOMINATE PROGRAMS
RELATED LINKS
RESOURCES
DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE
DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE
Truant Recovery Program
Intervention:
The Truant Recovery Program is a collaborative effort between the school district and all community police jurisdictions within its boundaries. The program is preventive rather than punitive. Its primary task is to return truant students to school as soon as possible. The program operates under the authority of the Student Welfare and Attendance (SWAT) Office. The program authorizes the local police jurisdictions to make contact with students on the streets during school hours. Students without a valid excuse slip are taken into temporary custody and transported to the SWAT office for processing. SWAT personnel attempt to contact the youth’s parents for an in-person meeting, in which both can be counseled and the parent can return the child to school. If a parent cannot be reached, SWAT personnel return the youth to school. The school site is also contacted, and both the school and SWAT Office closely monitor the student’s attendance in the future.
Three additional components of the program provide both accountability and consequences. First, the Department of Probation assigns an officer to the SWAT program to screen all contacted juveniles for probation violations and bench warrants. Second, the Student Attendance Review Board reviews records for habitual truancy cases and refers cases to the juvenile court for review and adjudication. Finally, the Suspension Alternative Class (SAC) is designed to make sure truant students are not rewarded for truancy by missing more school. Instead, students in SAC remain in school but are unable to engage in regular classes.
Evaluation Methodology:
The Truant Recovery Program was evaluated using a quasi-experimental design. One hundred seventy-eight students were randomly selected from all of the truant youths picked up in Richmond, Calif., during autumn 1997. Of all the truant youths picked up, 69 percent were male, 60 percent were African-American, 25 percent were Hispanic, 8 percent were Asian-American, and 3 percent were white. The median age was 15. For those youths in the sample, local and State criminal justice data was collected for the years prior to their truancy through 18 to 21 months after contact with the program. Academic data was collected for 3 years prior to the truancy until 2 years after the contact.
Evaluation Outcome:
The evaluation of the Truant Recovery Program suffered from problems of missing data. The results show an increase in conformity to school regulations after contact with the program and a decrease in the number of disciplinary actions. However, during this same period there was an increase in formal contacts with the justice system and an increase in the proportion of arrests (4 percent of the truants were arrested before autumn 1997, compared with 8 percent after the fall, though this is not a significant increase). The number of both excused and unexcused absences decreased after contact with the program, which was the goal of the program. Academics improved slightly after contact with the program; however, the large amount of missing data makes it difficult to make a true analysis of this variable.
Other Information:
References:
White, Michael D., James J. Fyfe, Suzanne P. Campbell, and John S. Goldkamp. 2001. “The School-Police Partnership: Identifying at-Risk Youth Through a Truant Recovery Program.”
Evaluation Review
25(5):507–32.
Program Specification:
Current Rating:
Promising
Expected Date of Re-Review:
Summer 2013
Program Type:
Community and Problem-Oriented Policing
Truancy Prevention
Ethnicity:
Asian
African American
Hispanic or Latino (of any race)
White
Gender:
Both
Age:
11
-
18
Special Populations:
Truant/Dropout
Problem Behaviors:
Academic Problems
Risk & Protective Factors:
Risk
Protective
Additional Information:
OJJDP: Blueprints
Status:
Program is in operation at this time.
Performance Measures:
Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):
School Programs
Truancy Prevention
Logic Model:
PDF
Performance Matrix:
PDF
Contact Information:
Program Developer:
Alan Del Simone
Student Welfare and Attendance Office
West Contra Costa Unified School District
Richmond,
CA
94805
Phone: 5102326379
Fax: 5102326395
Email:
Click Here
Website:
Click Here