Woodrock Youth Development Program (OJJDP Model Program Guide)

Office of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships – Safer Neighborhoods

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Serving Children, Families and Communities

PREVENTION

IMMEDIATE SANCTIONS

INTERMEDIATE SANCTIONS

RESIDENTIAL

REENTRY

MPG HOME SEARCH HOME SEARCH ENTIRE PROGRAM DATABASE SEARCH USING RISK & PROTECTIVE FACTORS PROGRAM TYPES RATING SYSTEM REFERENCES NOMINATE PROGRAMS RELATED LINKS RESOURCES DMC-REDUCTION BEST PRACTICES DATABASE DSO BEST PRACTICES DATABASE

Woodrock Youth Development Program

Intervention:

The Woodrock Youth Development Program (YDP) is a school-based program designed to prevent or reduce alcohol, tobacco, and other drug (ATOD) use among at-risk elementary and middle school minority youths and raise their awareness about the dangers of using such substances. YDP also seeks to improve these students’ self-esteem, school attendance, and attitudes toward racial and ethnic diversity and reduce their aggressive attitudes and behaviors.

The program achieves its goals by providing valuable extracurricular activities to engage youth, helping them develop general living and interpersonal skills, and by imparting ATOD–related knowledge and refusal skills. YDP is conceptually grounded in evidence that demonstrates the preventive effects of resistance and cultural competency training, peer mentoring, and family strengthening activities.

The YDP program model comprises three intervention components: 1) education, including human relations and life skills seminars in which role-playing and other simulations relevant to drug use are incorporated, 2) a program of structured alternative extracurricular activities both after school and on weekends, and 3) peer mediation. The program serves African-American, Latino, Asian-American, and white youths ages 6 through 14. Program youths attend public schools in North Philadelphia.

Evaluation Methodology:

Study 1
A classic randomized pretest–posttest control group design was used by LoSciuto, Hilbert, Fox, Porcellini, and Lanphear (1999) to examine mean changes in scores on seven outcome variables. Before program implementation, classrooms from four North Philadelphia public schools were selected and assigned randomly to either the experimental or control condition. Control group participants completed pretest and posttest measures but did not participate in the YDP program. Each school contained at least one experimental and one control group.

Two cohorts participated in the YDP, one during the 1995 academic year and one during the 1996 academic year. To gain additional statistical power, without adding costs associated with program intervention, about twice as many students were recruited for the control group as for the experimental group. Final sample sizes for the 1995 cohort were 130 for the experimental group and 239 for the control group, for a total of 369. Final sample sizes for the 1996 cohort were 114 experimental subjects and 235 controls, for a total of 349. On the basis of previous research on school-based drug prevention programs, it was anticipated that average program effects, if any, might be modest in magnitude, and it was felt that statistical power should be adequate to detect these effects. Therefore it was planned, if feasible, to combine data from the 2 program years to be studied. After a statistical comparison of the two cohorts revealed little difference between them in demographic characteristic—such as age, race, gender distribution, or school attendance—the two cohorts were combined.

Evaluation Outcome:

Study 1
The evaluation offered some evidence that YDP had several prosocial effects on program participants, especially students ages 6–9. These effects were most pronounced in substance abuse attitudes and behavior. The evaluation also revealed that, when compared with the control group, YDP participants evidenced significant decreases in alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use within the last month; decreased lifetime alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use; improved race relations and cultural sensitivity; and improved school attendance. Additional gains were noted in aggression and self-esteem; however, observed changes were not statistically significant.

Other Information:

References:

LoSciuto, Leonard, Susan M. Hilbert, Margaretta Fox, Lorraine Porcellini, and Alden Lanphear. 1999. “A 2-Year Evaluation of the Woodrock Youth Development Project.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 19:488–507.

Program Specification:

Current Rating:

Promising

Expected Date of Re-Review:

Summer 2013

Program Type:

Afterschool/Recreation

Alcohol and Drug Therapy / Education

Classroom Curricula

Conflict Resolution / Interpersonal Skills

Leadership and Youth Development

Ethnicity:

Asian

African American

Hispanic or Latino (of any race)

White

Gender:

Both

Age:

6 - 14

Target Settings:

Urban

Problem Behaviors:

Aggression/Violence

Alcohol,Tobacco and Other Drug Use

Risk & Protective Factors:

Risk

Community

Availability of alcohol and other drugs

Availability of firearms

Community crime / High crime neighborhood

Community instability

Economic deprivation / Poverty / Residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood

Neighborhood youth in trouble

Social and physical disorder / Disorganized neighborhood

Family

Family history of problem behavior / Parent criminality

Family management problems / Poor parental supervision and/or monitoring

Poor family attachment / Bonding

Individual

Antisocial behavior and alienation / Delinquent beliefs / General delinquency involvement / Drug dealing

Favorable attitudes toward drug use/Early onset of AOD use/Alcohol and/or drug use

Poor refusal skills

Peer

Association with delinquent and/or aggressive peers

Peer alcohol, tobacco, and/or other drug use

School

Low academic achievement

Negative attitude toward school / Low bonding / Low school attachment / Commitment to school

Protective

Community

Presence and involvement of caring, supportive adults in the community

Rewards for prosocial community involvement

Safe environment / Low neighborhood crime

Individual

Perception of social support from adults and peers

Positive / Resilient temperament

Self-efficacy

Social competencies and problem solving skills

Peer

Good relationships with peers

Involvement with positive peer group activities

School

Strong school motivation / Positive attitude toward school

Additional Information:

SAMHSA: NREPP

Status:

Program is in operation at this time.

Performance Measures:

Suggested OJJDP Performance Measures for the Program Types(s):

Delinquency Prevention
Afterschool/Recreation
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
Delinquency Prevention
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
School Programs
Classroom Curricula
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF
Delinquency Prevention
Leadership and Youth Development
Logic Model: PDF
Performance Matrix:PDF

Contact Information:

Program Developer:
Carol Smith, Executive Director
Woodrock, Inc.
1229 Chestnut Street, Suite M7
Philadelphia, PA 19107–4140
Phone: 1.215.231.9810
Fax: 1.215.231.9815
Email: Click Here
Website: Click Here