U.S. Department of Justice, Office Of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships - Safer Neighborhoods
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Serving Children, Families, and Communities
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logo jump over products navigation bar
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logoAbout SSBFrequently Asked QuestionsPublicationsData Analysis ToolsNational Data SetsOther ResourcesAsk a Question

Juvenile Population Characteristics
Juveniles as Victims
Juveniles as Offenders
Juvenile Justice System Structure & Process
Law Enforcement & Juvenile Crime
Juveniles in Court
Juveniles on Probation
Juveniles in Corrections
Overview
Related FAQs
Related Publications
Related Links
Data Analysis Tools
Juvenile Reentry & Aftercare
Special Topics
Data Snapshot
Statistical Briefing Book Home

OJJDP logo

Printer-priendlyPrinter-friendly
Juveniles in Corrections
Offenses
Q: Does the offense profile of youth held in residential placement vary by State?
A: Most States had a greater proportion of youth held for person offenses than for property offenses.

Offense profile of youth in residential placement by State, 2019

State of offense Total Person Property Drug Public
order
Technical
violations
Status
U.S. total 100% 43% 21% 4% 14% 14% 4%
Alabama 100% 34% 26% 5% 13% 17% 5%
Alaska 100% 40% 26% †2% 12% 16% 4%
Arizona 100% 23% 24% 10% 16% 27% 0%
Arkansas 100% †34% †23% 6% †13% †24% 1%
California 100% †45% †15% †2% †14% †23% 0%
Colorado 100% 54% 24% 3% 17% †2% 0%
Connecticut *100% *41% *44% *0% *6% *9% *3%
Delaware 100% 42% 21% 0% 30% 7% 0%
District of Columbia 100% 62% 18% 3% 18% 0% 0%
Florida 100% 36% 35% 4% 12% 13% 0%
Georgia 100% 64% 24% 1% 7% 1% 3%
Hawaii *100% *43% *19% *5% *5% *29% *0%
Idaho 100% 32% 29% 11% 24% 4% †3%
Illinois 100% †40% †19% †4% 23% †13% †1%
Indiana 100% 38% 18% 9% 18% 11% 6%
Iowa 100% 47% 30% 7% 13% 3% 1%
Kansas 100% 68% 14% 3% 7% 7% 3%
Kentucky 100% 39% 12% 4% 16% 4% 25%
Louisiana 100% 42% 31% 2% 10% 8% 6%
Maine *100% *40% *40% *0% *15% *0% *0%
Maryland 100% 39% 21% 6% 13% 19% †1%
Massachusetts 100% 48% 15% 5% 29% 2% 1%
Michigan 100% 40% 19% 4% 14% 16% 7%
Minnesota 100% †39% †19% †3% †18% †17% 4%
Mississippi 100% 26% 44% 8% 9% 9% 3%
Missouri 100% 36% 31% 4% 14% 9% 6%
Montana 100% 37% 20% 7% †15% 17% †4%
Nebraska 100% †38% †17% 8% †15% 17% 6%
Nevada 100% 29% 15% 12% 21% 21% 1%
New Hampshire *100% *38% *13% *0% *38% *0% *0%
New Jersey 100% 57% 9% 7% 15% 12% †1%
New Mexico 100% 33% 9% 2% 9% 43% †3%
New York 100% 44% 24% 2% 9% 9% 11%
North Carolina 100% 39% 31% †2% 11% 14% 3%
North Dakota *100% *35% *19% *15% *19% *4% *4%
Ohio 100% 51% 17% 3% 14% 13% 3%
Oklahoma 100% 50% 25% 4% 10% 10% 0%
Oregon 100% 54% 21% 4% 13% 7% 1%
Pennsylvania 100% 38% 15% 9% 15% 16% 8%
Rhode Island 100% 33% 19% 6% 25% 8% 8%
South Carolina 100% 31% 22% 2% 13% 28% 4%
South Dakota 100% 46% 19% 7% †12% 14% 2%
Tennessee 100% 48% 13% 3% 22% 10% 4%
Texas 100% 50% 17% 4% 12% 16% †1%
Utah 100% 40% 27% 1% 17% 10% †4%
Vermont NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Virginia 100% 50% 20% 2% 11% 15% 3%
Washington 100% 62% 18% 2% 6% 11% 0%
West Virginia 100% 39% 21% 4% 9% 4% 22%
Wisconsin 100% 47% 29% 2% 18% †1% †3%
Wyoming 100% 20% 22% 20% 12% 14% 8%

* Percent based on a small denominator (fewer than 100 but at least 20 in the denominator).
† Interpret data with caution. In these states, 30% or more of the information for offense was imputed. Visit the EZACJRP methods section for more information about imputation.

NA: Too few youth (fewer than 20) to calculate a reliable percentage.

Notes: The term ‘youth’ refers to persons under age 21 who were in a facility because they were charged with or adjudicated for an offense.

This information is based on the state where the offense was committed. However, the state of offense is not always reported. Youth for whom state of offense was unknown are included in U.S. totals (1,895 in 2019). These instances are not evenly distributed across states. As such, users should exercise caution when examining state-level trends or comparing states. Visit the EZACJRP methods section for more information.

U.S. total includes a small number of youth (4) who committed their offense in a U.S. Territory but excludes youth in tribal facilities.

To preserve the privacy of the youth in residential placement, state cell counts have been rounded to the nearest multiple of three. Detail may not add to total because of rounding. Percentages are based on rounded counts. More information on this rounding rule is available on the EZACJRP Web site.

[ Map version ]  [ CSV file ]


Internet citation: OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/corrections/qa08301.asp?qaDate=2019. Released on May 21, 2021.

Data Source: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement 2019 [machine-readable data files]. Washington, D.C.: OJJDP.

 

USA.gov | Privacy | Policies & Disclaimers | FOIA | Site Map | Ask a Question | OJJDP Home
A component of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice