U.S. Department of Justice, Office Of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships - Safer Neighborhoods
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Serving Children, Families, and Communities
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logo jump over products navigation bar
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logoAbout SSBFrequently Asked QuestionsPublicationsData Analysis ToolsNational Data SetsOther ResourcesAsk a Question

Juvenile Population Characteristics
Juveniles as Victims
Juveniles as Offenders
Juvenile Justice System Structure & Process
Law Enforcement & Juvenile Crime
Juveniles in Court
Juveniles on Probation
Juveniles in Corrections
Juvenile Reentry & Aftercare
Special Topics
Data Snapshot
Statistical Briefing Book Home

OJJDP logo

Printer-priendlyPrinter-friendly
Juveniles in Court
Delinquency Cases
Q: Do trends in the number of detained cases vary by offense?
A: The number of cases involving detention decreased for all offense categories between 2005 and 2020.

Detained delinquency cases by offense, 2005-2020

Year Person Property Drugs Public order
2005 134,500 115,900 41,400 110,200
2006 129,700 112,900 39,800 109,900
2007 129,700 111,700 38,500 108,700
2008 124,000 108,700 33,800 100,400
2009 112,100 98,500 29,900 92,100
2010 105,700 89,700 28,700 83,800
2011 96,300 82,700 26,000 78,700
2012 89,800 78,300 25,300 74,300
2013 83,900 70,600 22,300 70,200
2014 76,500 63,000 20,400 63,400
2015 74,500 60,700 17,900 60,900
2016 71,700 56,700 16,800 57,000
2017 71,200 56,800 16,300 52,500
2018 72,500 51,700 16,200 50,200
2019 71,700 47,500 14,500 46,000
2020 54,200 34,800 8,400 30,300

It is important to note that 2020 was the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have impacted policies, procedures, and data collection activities regarding referrals to and processing of youth by juvenile courts. Additionally, stay-at-home orders and school closures likely impacted the volume and type of law-violating behavior by youth referred to juvenile court in 2020.

[ Graph version ]  [ CSV file ]

  • Juvenile courts sometimes hold youth in secure detention facilities during processing of their case. Depending on the State's detention laws, the court may decide detention is necessary to ensure the youth's appearance at subsequent court hearings, to protect the community from the youth, or to secure the youth's own safety. Detention may also be ordered for the purpose of evaluating the youth.
  • The number of drug offense cases involving detention declined 80% between 2005 and 2020, public order offense cases involving detention fell 72%, property offense cases involving detention fell 70%, and person offense cases involving detention declined 60% during the same period.
  • Compared with 2005, the 2020 the detention caseload contained greater proportions of person (33% versus 42%) offense cases and a smaller proportion of property (29% versus 27%), drug (10% versus 7%), and public order (24% versus 27%) offense cases.

Internet citation: OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/court/qa06302.asp?qaDate=2020. Released on January 10, 2023.

Adapted from Easy Access to Juvenile Court Statistics. Available on-line at: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezajcs/.

Data Source: National Juvenile Court Data Archive. National Center for Juvenile Justice. Pittsburgh, PA.

 

USA.gov | Privacy | Policies & Disclaimers | FOIA | Site Map | Ask a Question | OJJDP Home
A component of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice