U.S. Department of Justice, Office Of Justice Programs, Innovation - Partnerships - Safer Neighborhoods
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Serving Children, Families, and Communities
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logo jump over products navigation bar
OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book logoAbout SSBFrequently Asked QuestionsPublicationsData Analysis ToolsNational Data SetsOther ResourcesAsk a Question

Juvenile Population Characteristics
Juveniles as Victims
Juveniles as Offenders
Juvenile Justice System Structure & Process
Law Enforcement & Juvenile Crime
Juveniles in Court
Juveniles on Probation
Juveniles in Corrections
Juvenile Reentry & Aftercare
Special Topics
Data Snapshot
Statistical Briefing Book Home

OJJDP logo

Printer-priendlyPrinter-friendly
Juveniles in Court
Delinquency Cases
Q: Has the juvenile courts' formal delinquency caseload grown?
A: After reaching a peak in 1997, the number of formally processed delinquency cases declined 58% through 2018.

Delinquency cases by manner of handling, 1985-2018

Year Formal Informal
1985 522,900 638,600
1986 553,900 643,100
1987 554,200 646,000
1988 571,000 636,800
1989 608,500 622,900
1990 631,500 672,600
1991 690,800 734,800
1992 736,800 761,100
1993 790,100 762,400
1994 862,100 826,300
1995 936,600 863,000
1996 986,700 853,900
1997 1,012,000 846,700
1998 996,600 776,000
1999 960,600 750,300
2000 942,700 750,200
2001 929,000 739,700
2002 925,300 730,000
2003 917,300 733,500
2004 898,400 755,300
2005 886,300 761,500
2006 870,700 716,400
2007 873,900 721,000
2008 855,300 718,400
2009 774,100 668,400
2010 701,300 622,400
2011 645,500 559,800
2012 599,900 507,800
2013 555,200 444,400
2014 517,000 415,500
2015 477,700 390,300
2016 457,900 361,300
2017 445,800 341,300
2018 422,100 322,400

[ Graph version ]  [ CSV file ]

  • A juvenile court intake officer or prosecutor determines whether to handle a delinquency case formally or informally. They may decide to dismiss the case for lack of legal sufficiency or to resolve the matter informally. Informal dispositions are voluntary and include referral to a social agency for services, informal probation, or some form of restitution.
  • Formal processing involves the filing of a petition requesting that the court hold an adjudicatory or waiver hearing. A waiver hearing could result in the juvenile court waiving its jurisdiction in the case, transferring the matter to criminal court. At an adjudicatory hearing the youth may be adjudicated (judged) delinquent and the case would proceed to a disposition hearing. If the youth is not adjudicated, the case is generally dismissed but the youth may be asked to take some actions, such as making restitution or voluntarily attending drug counseling, prior to the final adjudication decision.
  • The number of formally processed delinquency cases declined 58% between 1997 and 2018. Similarly, the number of informal handled cases decreased 62% during the time period.
  • Since 1993, formal cases have comprised a larger share of the delinquency caseload than informal cases. In 2018, there were 31% more formal than informal delinquency cases.

Internet citation: OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/court/qa06401.asp?qaDate=2018. Released on March 31, 2020.

Adapted from Easy Access to Juvenile Court Statistics. Available on-line at: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezajcs/.

Data Source: National Juvenile Court Data Archive. National Center for Juvenile Justice. Pittsburgh, PA.

 

USA.gov | Privacy | Policies & Disclaimers | FOIA | Site Map | Ask a Question | OJJDP Home
A component of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice