Q: |
How do juvenile arrest rates vary by State? |
A: |
State variations in juvenile arrest rates may reflect differences in juvenile law-violating behavior, police behavior, and/or community standards; therefore, comparisons should be made with caution. |
Juvenile arrest rates by State, 2018
State |
Reporting Coverage |
Aggravated assault |
Robbery |
Larceny theft |
Drug abuse |
Weapons |
United States |
82% |
84 |
52 |
286 |
269 |
50 |
Alabama |
63% |
48 |
35 |
200 |
41 |
28 |
Alaska |
99% |
187 |
27 |
279 |
234 |
23 |
Arizona |
92% |
95 |
56 |
348 |
467 |
36 |
Arkansas |
88% |
104 |
29 |
368 |
330 |
41 |
California |
100% |
97 |
73 |
75 |
73 |
68 |
Colorado |
87% |
87 |
42 |
486 |
447 |
55 |
Connecticut |
97% |
40 |
44 |
250 |
142 |
44 |
Delaware |
100% |
216 |
93 |
401 |
302 |
89 |
District of Columbia |
0% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Florida |
100% |
95 |
57 |
383 |
280 |
41 |
Georgia |
64% |
71 |
31 |
310 |
276 |
52 |
Hawaii |
81% |
46 |
44 |
224 |
324 |
12 |
Idaho |
89% |
62 |
10 |
418 |
504 |
51 |
Illinois |
22% |
59 |
190 |
302 |
281 |
209 |
Indiana |
60% |
96 |
38 |
309 |
267 |
47 |
Iowa |
0% |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Kansas |
45% |
19 |
3 |
54 |
141 |
2 |
Kentucky |
78% |
19 |
16 |
120 |
72 |
7 |
Louisiana |
85% |
204 |
49 |
537 |
362 |
106 |
Maine |
100% |
19 |
13 |
448 |
256 |
5 |
Maryland |
97% |
128 |
178 |
418 |
347 |
104 |
Massachusetts |
85% |
66 |
16 |
79 |
24 |
13 |
Michigan |
99% |
63 |
23 |
228 |
168 |
29 |
Minnesota |
99% |
71 |
60 |
569 |
291 |
54 |
Mississippi |
39% |
32 |
22 |
315 |
149 |
54 |
Missouri |
88% |
89 |
48 |
390 |
365 |
43 |
Montana |
94% |
61 |
10 |
564 |
370 |
15 |
Nebraska |
79% |
39 |
54 |
733 |
605 |
47 |
Nevada |
99% |
305 |
98 |
276 |
402 |
75 |
New Hampshire |
97% |
29 |
13 |
229 |
284 |
3 |
New Jersey |
88% |
56 |
46 |
174 |
349 |
59 |
New Mexico |
67% |
128 |
15 |
240 |
315 |
44 |
New York |
49% |
62 |
53 |
286 |
298 |
33 |
North Carolina |
52% |
55 |
75 |
301 |
257 |
70 |
North Dakota |
100% |
86 |
12 |
460 |
584 |
31 |
Ohio |
77% |
55 |
30 |
256 |
183 |
36 |
Oklahoma |
98% |
64 |
22 |
292 |
274 |
35 |
Oregon |
89% |
58 |
31 |
373 |
471 |
28 |
Pennsylvania |
99% |
128 |
64 |
277 |
268 |
59 |
Rhode Island |
100% |
67 |
46 |
314 |
108 |
89 |
South Carolina |
87% |
69 |
41 |
385 |
445 |
94 |
South Dakota |
92% |
75 |
19 |
579 |
935 |
108 |
Tennessee |
94% |
133 |
63 |
417 |
368 |
65 |
Texas |
93% |
73 |
40 |
243 |
318 |
29 |
Utah |
84% |
56 |
26 |
615 |
636 |
39 |
Vermont |
98% |
37 |
7 |
137 |
70 |
22 |
Virginia |
97% |
34 |
40 |
296 |
261 |
36 |
Washington |
85% |
71 |
52 |
258 |
168 |
34 |
West Virginia |
58% |
33 |
3 |
45 |
69 |
9 |
Wisconsin |
99% |
91 |
44 |
605 |
540 |
76 |
Wyoming |
88% |
93 |
2 |
559 |
1,082 |
30 |
NA = Crime in the United States 2018 reported no arrest counts for the District of Columbia and Iowa.
Note: In this table the arrest rate is defined as the number of arrests of persons under age 18 for every 100,000 persons ages 10-17. Juvenile arrests (arrests of youth under age 18) reported at the State level in Crime in the United States cannot be disaggregated into more detailed age categories so that the arrests of persons under age 10 can be excluded in the rate calculation.
[ CSV file ]
Notes: Arrest rates for jurisdictions with less than complete reporting may not be representative of the entire state. Although juvenile arrest rates may largely reflect juvenile behavior, many other factors can affect the magnitude of these rates. Arrest rates are calculated by dividing the number of youth arrests made in the year by the number of youth living in the jurisdiction. Therefore, jurisdictions that arrest a relatively large number of nonresident juveniles would have a higher arrest rate than jurisdictions where resident youth behave similarly. Jurisdictions (especially small ones) that are vacation destinations or that are centers for economic activity in a region may have arrest rates that reflect the behavior of nonresident youth more than that of resident youth. Other factors that influence arrest rates in a given area include the attitudes of citizens toward crime, the policies of local law enforcement agencies, and the policies of other components of the justice system. In many areas, not all law enforcement agencies report their arrest data to the FBI. Rates for such areas are necessarily based on partial information and may not be accurate. Comparisons of juvenile arrest rates across jurisdictions can be informative. Because of factors noted, however, comparisons should be made with caution.
Internet citation: OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book. Online. Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/qa05103.asp?qaDate=2018.
Released on October 31, 2019.
Data Source: Adapted from the FBI's 2018 Crime in the United States Report [Tables 5 and 69].
USA.gov | Privacy | Policies & Disclaimers | FOIA | Site Map | Ask a Question | OJJDP Home A component of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice
|